Evaluating the cellular tropism of RNA therapeutics ex vivo

Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) are recognised as a leading delivery platform following clinical success in vaccine and therapeutic applications.
Medicines Discovery Catapult (MDC) has built a preclinical platform to evaluate LNPs against two major challenges in the field.
In this blog, Lead Scientist, Dr Phil Auckland, presents a case study of this workflow using intravenously administered LNPs encapsulating mRNA, which differentially target four major liver cell types.

June 2026


Hexagonal microscopy image showing cellular tropism of lipid nanoparticles in live-cell fluorescence assay as part of lipid nanoparticle preclinical screening MDC.



The growing need for tropism-specific delivery tools

The RNA therapeutic market has surged since 2021, driven primarily by the increase in mRNA and siRNA therapies in development (Figure 1a).  These drugs target prevalent and diverse pathologies, from gene therapies for rare conditions to anticancer agents and cardiovascular drugs (Figure 1b). Such widespread application has necessitated the development of delivery technologies capable of protecting delicate RNA payloads and targeting them to disease-associated cells in a programmable and precise manner. As such, tools capable of quantitatively evaluating payload effect with cell type specificity in tissues isolated from model systems have become evermore valuable. These empower innovators to maximise on-target efficacy and preclinical translatability by providing a granular understanding of vehicle-payload biodistribution and target modulation.

Two charts, chart A showing the number of RNAi, ASO, mRNA and other therapies increasing between 2021 and 2026. Chart B lists the types of therapies available per disease type with rare disease at the top, followed by anticancer, anti-infective, neurological, metabolic, cardiovascular, musculoskeletal, unspecified, respiratory, sensory, blood and clotting, immunological, genitourinary, dermatological, antiparsitic, miscellaneous and hormonal.

Figure 1. The RNA therapeutic market from modality (a) and disease area (b) perspectives.

LNPs are recognised as a leading delivery platform following clinical success in vaccine and therapeutic applications. LNPs are made by combining neutral and sterol lipids with an ionisable lipid that encapsulates the RNA payload and a PEG lipid that reduces aggregation and extends circulation time (Figure 2). Medicines Discovery Catapult (MDC), as part of the Intracellular Drug Delivery Centre (IDDC), has built a preclinical platform to evaluate LNPs against two major challenges in the field, (1) limited cytosolic payload delivery, and (2) programmable tropism in vivo. To help address the latter, MDC has established a deep learning-based immunofluorescence workflow to quantify mRNA payload expression with single-cell resolution ex vivo. Below, we present a case study of this workflow using intravenously administered LNPs encapsulating mGreenLantern (mGL, a GFP variant) mRNA, which differentially target four major liver cell types (Figure 2).

LNP composition and hepatic tropism

A graphic showing Left Lipid nanoparticles are made by combining structural phospholipid and sterol components with an ionisable lipid that encapsulates the RNA payload and a PEG lipid that reduces aggregation and extends circulation time. Middle & right When administered intravenously, many lipid nanoparticles display strong hepatic tropism through binding of apolipoprotein E, ultimately delivering their payload to one of the four constituent liver cell types.

Figure 2: The composition and fate of liver-tropic LNPs. Left Lipid nanoparticles are made by combining structural phospholipid and sterol components with an ionisable lipid that encapsulates the RNA payload and a PEG lipid that reduces aggregation and extends circulation time. Middle & right When administered intravenously, many lipid nanoparticles display strong hepatic tropism through binding of apolipoprotein E, ultimately delivering their payload to one of the four constituent liver cell types.

 

Building a deep-learning workflow to quantify tropism ex vivo

To evaluate mGL expression in distinct liver cell populations ex vivo we built an immunofluorescence workflow with automated sample preparation, imaging, and analysis (Figure 3a-d). Here, FFPE liver sections were prepared from mice treated with a clinical LNP encapsulating mGL mRNA and stained with DAPI and antibodies against mGL, N-cadherin, and a cell type marker. A deep-learning model was trained in Visiopharm to segment the morphologically diverse cell types based on marker staining, from which a mask was created to calculate the mGL positivity rate for the respective cell population (Figure 3c,d). The approach was validated using a panel of clinical LNP formulations encapsulating mGL mRNA dosed at three time points (Figure 4). This demonstrated that mGL mRNA expression is a function of formulation, time, and cell type, and validated the assay for precise quantification of payload expression with cellular resolution (Figure 4).

Graphic showing workflow for automated preparation, imaging, and analysis of cellular tropism in murine liver sections.

Figure 3: A workflow for automated preparation, imaging, and analysis of cellular tropism in murine liver sections. (a) Sample preparation. (b) Automated tissue region detection with edge exclusion. (c) Training a deep learning model for segmentation of hepatocytes based on CPS1 staining. Zoom boxes depict show the raw immunofluorescence image and the manual segmentation of that region used for training, respectively. (d) Example images showing immunofluorescence staining for all four main liver cells types (top row) and the deep-learning based segmentation of that cell type using the marker staining. Zooms show individual segmented cells.

 

Graphic showing Figure 4: Evaluation of clinical LNP formulations encapsulating mGL mRNA across time points and cell types.

Figure 4: Evaluation of clinical LNP formulations encapsulating mGL mRNA across time points and cell types.

 

Quantifying directed cellular tropism

Our analysis has shown how key factors, such as formulation and cell type, control general expression trends. For example, hepatocytes and Kupffer cells are more readily transfected than hepatic stellate cells, and formulations 2 and 3 outperform formulation 1 in all cell types. Nevertheless, given the scope of target cells, developers must look beyond trends and instead optimise formulation to direct transfection toward a single cell type. We therefore sought to demonstrate our workflow was suitable for this purpose using a well-established example; that PEG can control cellular LNP tropism between hepatocytes and Kupffer cells. Mice were intravenously administered LNP -PEG or LNP +PEG particles encapsulating mGL mRNA and liver sections prepared at 24 hr. mGL positivity was quantified in hepatocytes and Kupffer cells as above, revealing a striking reciprocal relationship where LNP +PEG particles primarily transfected hepatocytes while LNP -PEG particles primarily transfected Kupffer cells (Figure 5). 

Graphic showing Figure 5: Directing LNP cellular tropism with PEG. PEG-containing LNPs primarily transfect hepatocytes (above) while LNPs formulated without PEG primary transfect Kupffer cells (below).

Figure 5: Directing LNP cellular tropism with PEG. PEG-containing LNPs primarily transfect hepatocytes (above) while LNPs formulated without PEG primary transfect Kupffer cells (below).

 

What this means for delivery vehicle optimisation

In summary, we present an immunofluorescence workflow supported by deep-learning image analysis to evaluate cellular tropism in ex vivo tissue. The approach is readily applicable to other tissue types, delivery vehicles, and payloads. By enabling innovators to quantify targeting with such granularity, this method will help optimise delivery vehicles for the precise tropism required to realise the full potential of RNA payloads.




Evaluating an LNP or RNA therapeutic delivery programme?

MDC’s preclinical cascade combines high-throughput formulation screening, mechanistic intracellular delivery characterisation, and in vivo biodistribution to build experimental confidence at every stage.

Speak to the team to learn how we can accelerate your path to the clinic.

New Modalities

























Share
LinkedIn X Link





Other blogs

Blogs
05 July 2026
From Photons to Phenotype

By looking beyond the diffraction limit, we have established a method to quantitatively distinguish low-grade breast cancers that appear identical by traditional means. Ultimately, this nanoscale insight could expand access to novel HER2-targeted therapies by reliably identifying low expressing cohorts that would benefit from intervention.


Blogs
15 June 2026
Preclinical evaluation of RNA nanotherapeutics – a case study of lipid nanoparticles

Opening new avenues for RNA therapeutics through a preclinical screening and optimisation platform. In this blog, Lead Scientist Dr Phil Auckland describes how applying this platform to a library of 4,500 lipid nanoparticle (LNP) formulations enabled the identification of novel candidates with desirable mechanistic properties and in vivo functionality. Furthermore, we show that integrating multiple in vitro readouts can enhance prediction and thereby improve translation.


Blogs
13 March 2026
What clinicians need from a preclinical radiopharmaceutical data package

Preclinical data are essential for decision‑making in radiopharmaceutical development, and all stakeholders require a robust evidence base. However, each stakeholder brings a slightly different lens to both designing studies and interpreting the resulting evidence.





Medicines Discovery Catapult